Is sham acupuncture as effective as traditional Chinese acupuncture? It's too early to say / 中国结合医学杂志
Chin. j. integr. med
; Chin. j. integr. med;(12): 483-489, 2016.
Article
de En
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-229511
Bibliothèque responsable:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
Many clinical trials and experimental studies claim that sham acupuncture is as effective as traditional Chinese acupuncture. However, these studies have no standard sham acupuncture control and many other factors can affect the clinical effect. These factors include needle retention time, treatment frequency, and the total number of treatments needed for satisfactory results, and all can change the clinical effect. The majority of existing acupuncture treatment studies do not consider these factors and lack standard dosage criteria. Therefore, it is still too early to conclude that sham acupuncture is as effective as traditional Chinese acupuncture. This article investigates the factors that influence the curative effect of acupuncture as to help set a standard for acupuncture studies in the future.
Mots clés
Texte intégral:
1
Indice:
WPRIM
Sujet Principal:
Psychologie
/
Facteurs temps
/
Points d'acupuncture
/
Thérapie par acupuncture
/
Essais contrôlés randomisés comme sujet
/
Médecine traditionnelle chinoise
Type d'étude:
Clinical_trials
/
Diagnostic_studies
Limites du sujet:
Humans
langue:
En
Texte intégral:
Chin. j. integr. med
Année:
2016
Type:
Article