A review on reporting guidelines of clinical research in evidence based medicine / 中国中药杂志
China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica
;
(24): 2542-2547, 2015.
Article
Dans Anglais
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-284779
ABSTRACT
Good clinical practice should be based on evidence. Evidence quality should be based on critical appraisal in evidence based medicine (EBM). Evaluation of evidence quality plays an important role in evidence level clarifying, which is the core of EBM. Different recommendations for clinical practice often derive from evidence levels. Thus evidence quality evaluation is the first and most important step in EBM. There are lots of standards to evaluate evidence quality in the world. However there are two aspects of the evaluation, one is methodological evaluation and the other is reporting evaluation. This article collected a series of standards for clinical trials quality evaluation according to different research designs. It is hoped that the resource and introduction about the quality evaluation of clinical trials be helpful for medical researchers in China. Only being familiar with all kinds of standards of methodology and reporting, researchers could publish high quality scientific papers.
Texte intégral:
Disponible
Indice:
WPRIM (Pacifique occidental)
Sujet Principal:
Essais contrôlés randomisés comme sujet
/
Méta-analyse comme sujet
/
Recommandations comme sujet
/
Médecine factuelle
/
Recherche biomédicale
Type d'étude:
Essai clinique contrôlé
/
Guide de pratique
/
Revues systématiques évaluées
Limites du sujet:
Humains
langue:
Anglais
Texte intégral:
China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica
Année:
2015
Type:
Article
Documents relatifs à ce sujet
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS