Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A clinical study of paradoxical breathing during sleep in children / 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志
Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery ; (12): 742-746, 2010.
Article Dans Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-336884
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>Abnormal breathing during sleep included many patterns. In this study, we investigated paradoxical breathing patterns during sleep in children using standard polysomnography (PSG).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Children who come to the ENT because of snoring were included into the study consecutively. Those who had craniofacial anomalies, diabetes, chronic lung diseases, and neuromuscular diseases were excluded. At the same time, no sleep snoring children were include as controls. Thirty-eight snoring children and twenty-six no snoring children were recruited. Polysomnography (PSG) was performed on all subjects. We determined the frequency of paradoxical breathing patterns during sleep through blind analysis of polysomnograms obtained in all subjects and compared the difference between children with snoring and normal controls.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The appearance of paradoxical breathing was assessed in all subjects. Among children with snoring, the apparent amount of paradoxical breathing time and the percent of paradoxical breathing time spent in total sleep time (x(-) ± s) were (70.1 ± 40.4) min and 17.9% ± 11.0% respectively. Comparing with control group (28.2 ± 25.7) min and 7.3% ± 6.8%, there was obvious difference (paradoxical breathing time t = 5.060, percent of paradoxical breathing time t = 4.767, P < 0.05). Thirty-eight snoring children were divided into normal-mild group (eighteen children) and moderate-severe group (twenty children). The children whose PSG results were normal and mild had more paradoxical breathing time and the percent of paradoxical breathing time than moderate-severe group. The apparent amount of paradoxical breathing time of normal-mild group, moderate-severe group and control group were (85.9 ± 31.7) min, (55.8 ± 42.7) min and (28.2 ± 25.7) min. Among the three groups, there was obvious difference (F = 15.897, P < 0.05). The percent of paradoxical breathing time of the three groups were 22.0% ± 10.2%, 14.1% ± 10.5% and 7.3% ± 6.8% (F = 14.167, P < 0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Currently published polysomnographic scoring recommendations overlook some common breathing abnormalities during sleep that are associated with clinical complaints. Paradoxical breathing is abnormal breathing patterns during sleep and its appearance is used to aid in the identification of respiratory events.</p>
Sujets)
Texte intégral: Disponible Indice: WPRIM (Pacifique occidental) Sujet Principal: Respiration / Syndromes d&apos;apnées du sommeil / Ronflement / Études cas-témoins / Polysomnographie Type d'étude: Guide de pratique / Étude observationnelle / Étude pronostique / Facteurs de risque Limites du sujet: Adolescent / Enfant / Enfant d'âge préscolaire / Femelle / Humains / Mâle langue: Chinois Texte intégral: Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Année: 2010 Type: Article

Documents relatifs à ce sujet

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texte intégral: Disponible Indice: WPRIM (Pacifique occidental) Sujet Principal: Respiration / Syndromes d&apos;apnées du sommeil / Ronflement / Études cas-témoins / Polysomnographie Type d'étude: Guide de pratique / Étude observationnelle / Étude pronostique / Facteurs de risque Limites du sujet: Adolescent / Enfant / Enfant d'âge préscolaire / Femelle / Humains / Mâle langue: Chinois Texte intégral: Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Année: 2010 Type: Article