Precise hepatic pedicle dissection in anatomical hepatic segmentectomy / 中华肝胆外科杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To review the important points in the preoperative assessment and the surgical technique in precise hepatic pedicle dissection in anatomical hepatic segmentectomy.Methods 104 patients who underwent anatomical hepatic segmentectomy were divided into two groups according to the different surgical approaches adopted in a prospective and non-randomized manner:the precise hepatic pedicle dissection group (the precise group,n=44) and the conventional hepatectomy group (the conventional group,n=60).The perioperative and follow-up data were analyzed.Patients who had primary liver cancer,including hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma,were analyzed separately.Results (1) There was no perioperative death in the two groups.There was no significant differences in blood loss and transfusion between the 2 groups of patients (P=0.069,0.208; t=1.844,1.266).There was a significantly higher rate of vascular inflow occlusion (P=0.001).There were significantly longer periods of vascular inflow occlusion and operative time (P=0.001,0.001; t=3.849,3.574) in the precise group.There was no significant difference in postoperative complications (P=0.988) and the duration of postoperative hospital stay (P=0.509;t=0.662) between the two groups.(2) In patients with primary liver cancer,there were no significant differences between the precise group (n=29) and the conventional group (n=41) in tumor margin positivity,vascular invasion and pathological staging (P=0.985,0.630,0.769).(3) All patients were followed up for two years.When compared with the conventional group,the disease-free survival (P=0.012),overall survival (P =0.006),and median survival (16.5 ± 4.5mo vs.7.8 ± 3.8mo)were significantly longer in the precise group.Conclusion Precise hepatic pedicle dissection had the same safety and efficacy as conventional method in partial hepatectomy.For primary liver cancer,precise hepatic pedicle dissection had better survival compared to the conventional method when the surgical margin was negative.