Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Differences in delineation of organs at risk lead to dose uncertainties during intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharynx carcinoma / 中华放射肿瘤学杂志
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology ; (6): 239-243, 2014.
Article Dans Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-446680
ABSTRACT
Objective To assess the differences in delineation of organs at risk (OAR) and dosimetry between junior and senior physicians during intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and to evaluate the role of specific training in reducing the differences.Methods Sixteen patients newly diagnosed with NPC were selected in the study.The OAR was delineated separately by three junior physicians and three senior physicians,and the geometric and dosimetric differences were assessed relative to the reference OAR.Delineation was performed again for the two OARs with the biggest difference after specific training in the two groups of physicians,and the differences were evaluated again.The difference was determined by paired t test.Results The maximum dose differences (Dmax) of OAR in the junior and senior physicians were (2.33 ± 12.06) % (-48.06%-137.82%) and (0.09 ± 4.72) % (-49.54%-42.96%),respectively (P =0.039),and the difference in the optic chiasm was the greatest ((5.85 ± 19.63) % ∶ (1.36 ± 4.64) %,P =0.042).The mean dose differences (Dmean) of OAR in the junior and senior physicians were (3.10 ± 8.07)% (-46.76%-59.76%) and (-0.93 ± 2.03) % (-45.54%-35.69%),respectively (P =0.021),and the difference in the parotid gland was the greatest ((13.23 ± 13.39) % ∶ (3.20 ± 6.71) %,P =0.002).In the secondary delineation after training,the Dmax of the optic chiasm in the junior and senior physicians was (1.68 ± 3.34)% and (1.50 ± 1.87) %,respectively (P =0.841),and the difference in junior physicians was reduced significantly compared with before training ((1.68 ± 3.34) % ∶ (5.85 ± 19.63) %,P =0.048) ; the Dmean of the parotid gland in the junior and senior physicians was (2.46 ± 3.06) % and (1.35 ± 3.00) %,respectively (P =0.2 7 4),significantly reduced compared with before training ((2.46 ± 3.0 6) % ∶ (13.23 ± 13.39)%,P=0.002; (1.35 ± 3.00)% ∶ (3.20 ± 6.71) %,P =0.033).Conclusions The differences in delineation of OAR lead to dose uncertainties during IMRT for NPC,and specific training can improve the accuracy of delineation.

Texte intégral: Disponible Indice: WPRIM (Pacifique occidental) Type d'étude: Etude d'étiologie langue: Chinois Texte intégral: Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology Année: 2014 Type: Article

Documents relatifs à ce sujet

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texte intégral: Disponible Indice: WPRIM (Pacifique occidental) Type d'étude: Etude d'étiologie langue: Chinois Texte intégral: Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology Année: 2014 Type: Article