The comparative analysis between single-port access laparoscopic Miles surgery with jackknife position and laparoscopic Miles surgery with lithotomy position for low rectal cancer / 中国医师进修杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate the comparative analysis between single-port access laparoscopic Miles surgery with jackknife position and laparoscopic Miles surgery with lithotomy position for low rectal cancer.Methods Retrospectively analyzed 36 patients with low rectal cancer (TNM stageⅡ-Ⅲ) undergoing laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision.Patients were divided into two groups.Lithotomy position grouplaparoscopic Miles surgery with lithotomy position.Jackknife position groupsingle-port access laparoscopic Miles surgery with jackknife position.The operation time,blood loss,postoperative recovery,postoperative complication,postoperative recurrence and survival rate were observed.Results Blood loss of perineal position in jackknife position group was less than that in lithotomy position group [(31.5 ± 22.4) ml vs.(53.5 ± 25.6) ml] (P =0.01),and removal of drainage tube in jackknife position group was earlier than that in lithotomy position group [(6.7 ± 1.9) d vs.(9.8 ± 1.7) d] (P ＜ 0.01).However,the operation time,blood loss in abdomen,blood loss,postoperative out-of-bed activity time,recovery of gastrointestinal function time,dermal sutures out time,postoperative hospital stay,complication,postoperative recurrence in 2 years and survival rate between two groups had no significant difference (P ＞0.05).Conclusions Single-port access laparoscopic Miles surgery is safe and feasible with better surgical outcome and cosmetic benefits.Furthermore,the blood loss and postoperative exudation at perineal region is less than that in traditional lithotomy position.