Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Glucocorticoid combined with mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide in the treatment for adult refractory nephrotic syndrome:a Meta-analysis / 天津医药
Tianjin Medical Journal ; (12): 559-565, 2015.
Article Dans Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-473846
ABSTRACT
Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide in adults with refractory nephrotic syndrome. Methods The randomized controlled trials of mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide treatment for refractory nephrotic syndrome were searched from Cochrane library, PubMed, Embase, Wanfang, VIP and CNKI till March 2014. The relevant studies were screened according to inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria. The quality of the included studies was evaluated. Meta-analyses were performed by using RevMan 5.2 software. The indexes were analyzed including the complete remission rate, efficiency, serum albumin, and adverse reaction after completing the treatment for adults with refractory nephrotic syndrome. Results There were 9 RCTs, a total of 467 patients were enrolled. The result of the meta-analysis showed that mycophenolate mofetil could significantly increase complete remission rate (RR=1.45, 95%CI=1.17~1.81, P=0.000 7) and efficiency rate (RR=1.23, 95%CI=1.11~1.36, P<0.000 1). It can also enhance the level of serum albumin (WMD=2.73, 95%CI=1.42~4.04, P<0.000 1) and decrease 24-hour urinary protein (SMD=-0.63, 95%CI=-1.16~-0.10, P=0.02) compared with cyclophosphamide in the treatment of refractory nephrotic syndrome. There was no significant difference in the serum level of cholesterol between mycophenolate mofetil group and cyclophosphamide group (SMD=0.31, 95%CI=-0.23~0.84, P=0.26 ). The incidence rates of liver dysfunction (RR=0.13,95%CI=0.06~0.28, P<0.000 01), leukopenia (RR=0.10, 95%CI=0.04~0.23, P<0.000 01), gastrointestinal reaction (RR=0.21, 95%CI=0.11~0.39, P<0.000 01) and alopecia (RR=0.08, 95%CI=0.02~0.29, P<0.000 01) were significantly lower in mycophenolate mofetil group than those of cyclophosphamide group. There were no significant differences in respiratory tract infection rate (RR=0.68, 95%CI=0.41~1.14, P=0.14) and lung infection rate (RR=0.58, 95%CI=0.31~1.08, P=0.09) between the two groups. Conclusion The safety and efficacy are better in the treatment of refractory nephrotic syndrome using mycophenolate mofetil than that of cyclophosphamide.

Texte intégral: Disponible Indice: WPRIM (Pacifique occidental) Type d'étude: Essai clinique contrôlé / Revues systématiques évaluées langue: Chinois Texte intégral: Tianjin Medical Journal Année: 2015 Type: Article

Documents relatifs à ce sujet

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texte intégral: Disponible Indice: WPRIM (Pacifique occidental) Type d'étude: Essai clinique contrôlé / Revues systématiques évaluées langue: Chinois Texte intégral: Tianjin Medical Journal Année: 2015 Type: Article