Meta-analysis on PFNA and DHS in treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fracture / 重庆医学

ABSTRACT

Objective To evaluate the effects and security of PFNA and DHS in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures through meta analysis .Methods The randomized controlled trials(RCT) for comparing PFNA and DHS in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fracture were retrieved from MEDLINE ,EMbase ,Pubmed ,Cochrane library ,CBM ,CNKI ,VIP data‐bases by computer .The related orthopedic relevant documents and conference papers were collected by manual retrieval .The Rev‐Man5 .1 statistical software was used for conducting the meta analysis .Results Nineteen RCT were included ,involving 1 690 pa‐tients ,in which 871 cases were treated by using PFNA and 819 cases were treated by using DHS .Compared with DHS ,PFNA had the advantages of little trauma ,less blood loss ,short operation time ,short fracture healing time and postoperative bed time ,good hip function and low incidence of postoperative coxa vara and screw cutting ,but there were no statistical differences in the aspects of length of hospital stay ,fatality rate ,and incidences of fracture nonunion ,breakage of internal fixation ,femoral head necrosis ,short‐ening of the femoral neck ,femoral shaft fractures ,deep vein thrombosis ,urinary tract infection and other complications between the two groups(P>0 .05) .Conclusion The retrieved literatures show that PFNA internal fixation is superior to DHS internal fixation in treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures .