Comparison between ultrasound-guided cervical transverse process block and interscalene brachial plexus block in patients undergoing proximal humeral surgeries / 临床麻醉学杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare effectiveness,performance,onset time and complications between ultrasound-guided cervical transverse process block and interscalene brachial plexus block in patients undergoing proximal humeral surgeries.Methods Sixty patients,27 males and 33 females, aged 18-70 years,scheduled for proximal humeral surgeries were randomly divided into two groups. They were given either cervical transverse process block (group T,n =30)or ultrasound-guided in-terscalene brachial plexus block (group I,n =30).All patients received a total of 8 ml of 0.5% ropiv-acaine.The performance, anesthetic onset time, the side effects and block success rate were evaluated.Results Block procedure was quicker in group T than in group I [(8.73 ±3.1 7)min vs. (14.40±8.21)min,P <0.01].The severity of diaphragmatic paralysis in group T was significantly lower than in group I (P <0.01).The ultrasound-guided cervical transverse process block was more effective than the interscalene brachial plexus block in patients undergoing proximal humeral surgeries (100% vs.80%,P <0.05).Conclusion The ultrasound-guided cervical transverse process block has a higher success rate and fewer incidence of diaphragmatic paralysis than the interscalene brachial plexus block in patients undergoing proximal humeral surgeries.