Comparison between Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy and Open Surgery for Large Renal Carcinoma / 中国微创外科杂志
Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
;
(12)2001.
Article
Dans Chinois
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-591452
ABSTRACT
5 cm in diameter)were enrolled in this study.Aomong the patients,17 underwent RLRN,and 14 patients received open radical nephrectomy(ORN).The outcomes of the two groups were compared.Results In both the groups,the operations were completed.The blood loss in RLRN group was less than that in ORN group [(245.9?75.5)ml vs(640.5?174.8)ml,t=-8.425,P=0.000].No significant difference was found between the two groups in operation time [(164.8?44.6)min vs(182.7?30.3)min,t=-1.277,P=0.212],postoperative hospital stay [(7.1?3.2)d vs(9.6?5.7)d,t=-1.541,P=0.134],and survival rate(Log-rank test,?2=0.243,P=0.622).Conclusion The efficacy of RLRN is similar to that of ORN.RLRN is safe and induce less blood loss.
Texte intégral:
Disponible
Indice:
WPRIM (Pacifique occidental)
langue:
Chinois
Texte intégral:
Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
Année:
2001
Type:
Article
Documents relatifs à ce sujet
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS