The Usefulness of T2-weighted MR Urography and Contrast Enhanced MR Urography in the Evaluation of Obstructive Uropathy: Comparisonal Study with Antegrade Pyelography1

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted magnetic resonance urography (MRU) for the depiction of obstruction and evaluation of the causes of obstructive uropathy with that of antegrade pyelography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients with obstructive uropathy who underwent percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) and antegrade pyelography (AGP) were included in the study. We performed MR urography, comprising half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) T2-weighted imaging and 3-D fast imaging with steady state precession (3-D FISP) T1-weighted imaging after gadolinium enhancement and compared the quality of the images of both the HASTE and 3-D FISP MRU techniques in terms of their depiction of the dilated pelvocalyceal system, and the level, type, and causes of obstruction. RESULTS: In terms of anatomical depiction of the pelvocalyceal system (p=0.002) and the causes of obstruction (p=0.003), T1-weighted MRU using 3D-FISP was significantly better than T2-weighted MRU using the HASTE sequence. Regarding level of obstruction, T2-weighted MRU using the HASTE sequence and contrastenhanced T1-weighted MRU using 3D-FISP showed an accuracy of 76% (19/25) and 84% (21/25), respectively. In terms of type of obstruction, the accuracy of T2-weighted MRU and T1-weighted CEMRU was 72%(18/25) and 88% (22/25), respectively. CONCLUSION: T2-weighted MRU and T1-weighted CEMRU provided both anatomical information and that relating to impaired renal function. The two modelities played a complementary role and their use could decrease the unnecessary use of invasive diagnostic examination for the evaluation of obstructive uropathy.