Comparison of clinical effects of bare stent and covered metal stent graft in the treatment of complete occlusion of central venography in hemodialysis patients / 中华肾脏病杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of bare mental stent (BMS) and covered stent (CS) in the treatment of complete central venous occlusive disease (CVOD) in hemodialysis patients.Methods A total of 66 cases of CVOD who have been treated by endovascular methods successfully in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from Jan 2015 to Jan 2017 were enrolled in this study.According to the type of stent,the patients were divided into two groups,BMS group (n=46)and CS group (n=20).The demographic data,clinical signs and symptoms,and pre-procedure and post-procedure imaging data were followed up and recorded.The primary patency rates were calculated at 1,3,6,9,and 12 months.Results The related symptoms were improved within 2 day post-procedure.The primary patency rates of BMS group in 1,3,6,9 and 12 months were 97.83％,95.65％,69.56％,41.3％,and 34.78％ respectively.The rates of CS group were 100％,100％,95％,65％,and 60％respectively.They did not reached statistical significance for primary patency rates between two groups in 1,3,and 6 months (P ＞ 0.05 respectively).However,from 9 months after procedure,it began to show the significant difference between two groups (P ＜ 0.05).The median patency time of the CS group was (10.30±5.32) months,while BMS group was (8.52±0.49) months.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P=0.046).Conclusions Stent implantation for complete occlusion of central venous in hemodialysis patients can get credible effect.The use of CS for CVOD provides superior patency as well as patency time in long period after procedure as compared with BMS.