Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Inspiration of selecting peer review experts for nursing sci-tech journals with the review of different peer review′s conclusion papers / 中国实用护理杂志
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing ; (36): 1760-1761, 2020.
Article Dans Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-864664
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To discuss the method and strategy of selecting reviewers for nursing journals.

Methods:

Through the review practice of different review conclusions, this paper analyzed the reasons for the differences in review conclusions.

Results:

The methods and suggestions for selecting reviewers included more detailed research direction of reviewers and more comprehensive distribution of research direction; complementary "academic school" and "clinical school" in the same research direction; certain reserved candidates in hot research areas; full consideration of the energy and time of reviewers who hold concurrent administrative positions.

Conclusion:

The selection of reviewers of nursing journals should follow the characteristics of disciplines and fully consider the distribution of reviewers with different characteristics, so as to make the review process more professional and reliable.
Texte intégral: Disponible Indice: WPRIM (Pacifique occidental) langue: Chinois Texte intégral: Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing Année: 2020 Type: Article

Documents relatifs à ce sujet

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texte intégral: Disponible Indice: WPRIM (Pacifique occidental) langue: Chinois Texte intégral: Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing Année: 2020 Type: Article