To Blame or Not? Modulating Third-Party Punishment with the Framing Effect / 神经科学通报·英文版
Neuroscience Bulletin
;
(6): 533-547, 2022.
Article
Dans Anglais
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-929102
ABSTRACT
People as third-party observers, without direct self-interest, may punish norm violators to maintain social norms. However, third-party judgment and the follow-up punishment might be susceptible to the way we frame (i.e., verbally describe) a norm violation. We conducted a behavioral and a neuroimaging experiment to investigate the above phenomenon, which we call the "third-party framing effect". In these experiments, participants observed an anonymous perpetrator deciding whether to keep her/his economic benefit while exposing a victim to a risk of physical pain (described as "harming others" in one condition and "not helping others" in the other condition), then they had a chance to punish that perpetrator at their own cost. Our results showed that the participants were more willing to execute third-party punishment under the harm frame compared to the help frame, manifesting a framing effect. Self-reported anger toward perpetrators mediated the relationship between empathy toward victims and the framing effect. Meanwhile, activation of the insula mediated the relationship between mid-cingulate cortex activation and the framing effect; the functional connectivity between these regions significantly predicted the size of the framing effect. These findings shed light on the psychological and neural mechanisms of the third-party framing effect.
Texte intégral:
Disponible
Indice:
WPRIM (Pacifique occidental)
Sujet Principal:
Douleur
/
Punition
/
Empathie
/
Neuroimagerie
/
Gyrus du cingulum
Type d'étude:
Étude pronostique
Limites du sujet:
Femelle
/
Humains
langue:
Anglais
Texte intégral:
Neuroscience Bulletin
Année:
2022
Type:
Article
Documents relatifs à ce sujet
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS