Bricker ileal conduit vs. Cutaneous ureterostomy after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a systematic review
Int. braz. j. urol
;
48(1): 18-30, Jan.-Feb. 2022. tab, graf
Artigo
em Inglês
| LILACS
| ID: biblio-1356273
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Purpose:
A systematic review of the literature with available published literature to compare ileal conduit (IC) and cutaneous ureterostomy (CU) urinary diversions (UD) in terms of perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes of high-risk elderly patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC). Protocol Registration PROSPERO ID CRD42020168851. Materials andMethods:
A systematic review, according to the PRISMA Statement, was performed. Search through the Medline, Embase, Scopus, Scielo, Lilacs, and Cochrane Database until July 2020.Results:
The literature search yielded 2,883 citations and were selected eight studies, including 1096 patients. A total of 707 patients underwent IC and 389 CU. Surgical procedures and outcomes, complications, mortality, and quality of life were analyzed.Conclusions:
CU seems to be a safe alternative for the elderly and more frail patients. It is associated with faster surgery, less blood loss, lower transfusion rates, a lower necessity of intensive care, and shorter hospital stay. According to most studies, complications are less frequent after CU, even though mortality rates are similar. Studies with long-term follow up are awaited.
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
LILACS (Américas)
Assunto principal:
Derivação Urinária
/
Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária
Tipo de estudo:
Revisões Sistemáticas Avaliadas
Limite:
Idoso
/
Humanos
Idioma:
Inglês
Revista:
Int. braz. j. urol
Assunto da revista:
Urologia
Ano de publicação:
2022
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
País de afiliação:
Brasil
Instituição/País de afiliação:
Faculdade de Medicina do ABC/BR
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS