Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biofilm formation on complete denture liners
Rahal, Juliana Saab; Locks, Bruna Jussara Constantino; Mesquita, Marcelo Feraz; Henriques, Guilherme Elias Pessanha; Nóbilo, Mauro Antônio Arruda.
Afiliação
  • Rahal, Juliana Saab; Federal University of Paraná.
  • Locks, Bruna Jussara Constantino; Federal University of Paraná.
  • Mesquita, Marcelo Feraz; State University of Campinas.
  • Henriques, Guilherme Elias Pessanha; State University of Campinas.
  • Nóbilo, Mauro Antônio Arruda; State University of Campinas.
J. res. dent ; 3(1): 583-591, jan.-feb2015.
Article em En | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1363315
Biblioteca responsável: BR1916.9
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To clinically evaluate biofilm growth on 4 liners in complete denture base surfaces of 20 geriatric patients. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Patients received new complete maxillary dentures prepared with 4 chambers (10x10x2 mm) in the tissue surface of acrylic denture base. Each of the 4 chambers was randomly filled with the following denture liners Eversoft (M1); Kooliner (M2); GC Reline Extra Soft (M3); Elite Soft Relining (M4). Patients were randomly separated into 2 treatment groups T1- sanitization with soft brush and dentifrice; T2- similar to T1 with daily immersion in cleansing chemical solution (Ortoform). Patients had 8 follow-up sessions over a 3-month period. The internal denture surface was stained with a dental plaque dye at each of the follow-up visits. Standardized photographs were taken, and biofilm growth was scored. Data were tabulated and submitted to Analysis of Variance. Means were compared by Tukey (p<0.05) and T tests.

RESULTS:

Kooliner (M2) means were significantly different from the others for both groups T1 and T2. Treatment 1 promoted higher biofilm growth scores than treatment 2. The highest score after treatment 1 was Kooliner (M2) and the lowest was Elite Soft Relining (M4). As for treatment 2, Eversoft (M1) was statistically different from Elite Soft Relining (M4). Again, Kooliner (M2) presented the highest score and Elite Soft Relining (M4) the lowest. Kooliner (M2) was statistically different from both GC Reline Extra Soft (M3) and Elite Soft Relining (M4).

CONCLUSION:

Of the materials and treatments studied, the best clinical selection for lower biofilm growth scores would be Elite Soft Relining (M4) with treatment 2.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Índice: LILACS Idioma: En Revista: J. res. dent Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA / Sa£de Bucal Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Índice: LILACS Idioma: En Revista: J. res. dent Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA / Sa£de Bucal Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article