Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mapping community pharmacy services in Brazil: a scoping review
Garabeli, Aline Ansbach; Benetoli, Arcelio; Halila, Gerusa Clazer; Machinski, Isadora; Tonin, Fernanda Stumpf; Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando; Pontarolo, Roberto.
Afiliação
  • Garabeli, Aline Ansbach; Federal University of Paraná. Pharmaceutical Sciences Postgraduate Programme. Curitiba. BR
  • Benetoli, Arcelio; State University of Ponta Grossa. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences. BR
  • Halila, Gerusa Clazer; State University of Ponta Grossa. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences. BR
  • Machinski, Isadora; State University of Ponta Grossa. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences. BR
  • Tonin, Fernanda Stumpf; Federal University of Paraná. Pharmaceutical Sciences Postgraduate Programme. Curitiba. BR
  • Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando; University of Porto. Department of Drug Sciences. Laboratory of Pharmacology. Porto. PT
  • Pontarolo, Roberto; Federal University of Paraná. Department of Pharmacy. Curitiba. BR
Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. (Online) ; 58: e20851, 2022. tab, graf
Article em En | LILACS | ID: biblio-1420500
Biblioteca responsável: BR40.1
Localização: BR40.1
ABSTRACT
Abstract The delivery of clinical pharmacy services has been growing in Brazilian community pharmacies, and it is necessary to have a comprehensive understanding of the topic. This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of Brazilian studies about clinical pharmacy services in community pharmacies. Original research articles, with no restriction of time, study design, or patient's health condition, were included. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Scielo, and Lilacs. Two reviewers conducted the screening, full-text reading, and data extraction independently. ROB and ROBINS-I were used for the assessment of quality. Charts and tables were built to summarise the data. Seventy-two articles were included. A diversity of study designs, number of participants, terms used, and outcomes was found. São Paulo and Sergipe States had the highest number of studies (n=10). Pharmacists' interventions were not fully reported in 65% of studies, and most studies presented an unclear risk of bias. Studies were very diverse, impairing the comparisons between the results and hindering their reproducibility. This review suggests using guidelines and checklists for better structuration of pharmacists' interventions as well as reporting results and measuring fidelity in future research.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Índice: LILACS Assunto principal: Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar / Brasil / Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Systematic_reviews País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. (Online) Assunto da revista: Farmacologia / Terapˆutica / Toxicologia Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Índice: LILACS Assunto principal: Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar / Brasil / Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Systematic_reviews País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. (Online) Assunto da revista: Farmacologia / Terapˆutica / Toxicologia Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article