Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of screening practices for primary hyperaldosteronism by specialists and general practitioners: an observational, cross-sectional study
Taboada, Giselle Fernandes; Moraes, Aline Barbosa; Vieira Neto, Leonardo.
  • Taboada, Giselle Fernandes; Universidade Federal Fluminense. Departamento de Clínica Médica. Hospital Universitário Antônio. Niterói. BR
  • Moraes, Aline Barbosa; Universidade Federal Fluminense. Departamento de Clínica Médica. Hospital Universitário Antônio. Niterói. BR
  • Vieira Neto, Leonardo; Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Departamento de Clínica Médica. Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho. Rio de Janeiro. BR
Arch. endocrinol. metab. (Online) ; 68: e230211, 2024. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1556955
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT

Objective:

Despite its recognized importance, primary hyperaldosteronism (PHA) remains an underdiagnosed condition in clinical practice. The objective of the present study was to evaluate PHA screening practices by general practitioners and specialists in endocrinology and cardiology. Subjects and

methods:

This cross-sectional, observational study invited physicians to respond voluntarily to an online survey. The survey collected the respondents' sociodemographic data and answers to five hypothetical clinical cases meeting Endocrine Society criteria for PHA screening.

Results:

In all, 126 physicians responded to the online survey. Endocrinologists were the specialists who most often chose PHA screening, although the screening rates were overall low, ranging from 36.5% to 92.9%, depending on the case and the respondents' specialty. The survey also assessed the reasons for not choosing PHA screening, which included limited availability of tests within the public health services, interference of antihypertensive medications on hormone levels, and failure to identify the screening indication. Being an endocrinologist was an independent predictor for choosing PHA screening for the patients in Cases #1 and #5 (p = 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively).

Conclusion:

Endocrinologists were the specialists who most often chose PHA screening, although the screening rates were overall low among all specialists. These findings highlight a need for continuing medical education programs addressing PHA screening and making the diagnosis of PHA more present in the daily clinical practice of physicians treating patients with hypertension.


Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: LILACS (Américas) Idioma: Inglês Revista: Arch. endocrinol. metab. (Online) Assunto da revista: Endocrinologia / Metabolismo Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Artigo País de afiliação: Brasil Instituição/País de afiliação: Universidade Federal Fluminense/BR / Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro/BR

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: LILACS (Américas) Idioma: Inglês Revista: Arch. endocrinol. metab. (Online) Assunto da revista: Endocrinologia / Metabolismo Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Artigo País de afiliação: Brasil Instituição/País de afiliação: Universidade Federal Fluminense/BR / Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro/BR