Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Implantation of a biodegradable rectum balloon implant: Tips, Tricks and Pitfalls
Vanneste, Ben G. L; Beek, Kees van De; Lutgens, Ludy; Lambin, Philippe.
  • Vanneste, Ben G. L; Maastricht University Medical Center+. GROW -School for Oncology and Developmental Biology. Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO). Maastricht. NL
  • Beek, Kees van De; Maastricht University Medical Center+. GROW -School for Oncology and Developmental Biology. Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO). Maastricht. NL
  • Lutgens, Ludy; Maastricht University Medical Center+. GROW -School for Oncology and Developmental Biology. Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO). Maastricht. NL
  • Lambin, Philippe; Maastricht University Medical Center. GROW -School for Oncology and Developmental Biology. Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO). Maastricht. NL
Int. braz. j. urol ; 43(6): 1033-1042, Nov.-Dec. 2017. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-892923
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Introduction: A rectum balloon implant (RBI) is a new device to spare rectal structures during prostate cancer radiotherapy. The theoretical advantages of a RBI are to reduce the high radiation dose to the anterior rectum wall, the possibility of a post-implant correction, and their predetermined shape with consequent predictable position. Objective: To describe, step-by-step, our mini-invasive technique for hands-free transperineal implantation of a RBI before start of radiotherapy treatment. Materials and Methods: We provide step-by-step instructions for optimization of the transperineal implantation procedure performed by urologists and/or radiation oncologists experienced with prostate brachytherapy and the use of the real-time bi-plane transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) probe. A RBI was performed in 15 patients with localised prostate cancer. Perioperative side-effects were reported. Results: We provide 'tips and tricks' for optimizing the procedure and proper positioning of the RBI. Please watch the animation, see video in https://vimeo.com/205852376/789df4fae4. The side-effects included mild discomfort to slight pain at the perineal region in 8 out of 15 patients. Seven patients (47%) had no complaints at all. Two patients developed redness of the skin, where prompt antibiotic regimen was started with no further sequelae. One patient revealed a temporary urine retention, which resolved in a few hours following conservative treatment. Further no perioperative complications occurred. Conclusion: This paper describes in detail the implantation procedure for an RBI. It is a feasible, safe and very well-tolerated procedure.
Assuntos


Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: LILACS (Américas) Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Lesões por Radiação / Reto / Implantes Absorvíveis / Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão Limite: Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Inglês Revista: Int. braz. j. urol Assunto da revista: Urologia Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Artigo País de afiliação: Holanda Instituição/País de afiliação: Maastricht University Medical Center//NL / Maastricht University Medical Center/NL

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: LILACS (Américas) Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Lesões por Radiação / Reto / Implantes Absorvíveis / Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão Limite: Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Inglês Revista: Int. braz. j. urol Assunto da revista: Urologia Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Artigo País de afiliação: Holanda Instituição/País de afiliação: Maastricht University Medical Center//NL / Maastricht University Medical Center/NL