Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Virtual versus fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the evaluation of tracheobronchial neoplasms
Bulletin of Alexandria Faculty of Medicine. 2008; 44 (2): 365-371
em En | IMEMR | ID: emr-101690
Biblioteca responsável: EMRO
Lung tumours represent a true epidemic of the twentieth century. Patients with suspected tracheobronchial lesions typically undergo diagnostic evaluation consisting of CT scanning and fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Multislice CT is more than upgrade of single detector CT. Virtual bronchoscopy is the descriptive term given to representations of the bronchial tree and surrounding structures created from spatial information derived from imaging sources other than the bronchoscope itself. The present work aimed to assess accuracy of virtual bronchoscopy compared to fiberoptic bronchoscopy in evaluating tracheobronchial neoplasms. The studied group included 20 patients who were subjected to full history taking, clinical examination, routine laboratory investigations, radiologic evaluation using plain X-ray chest and Multidetector CT virtual bronchoscopy then fiberoptic bronchoscopy examination under local anesthesia. The mean age of the patients was 54.6 +/- 15.79 years. There were 14 male and 6 female patients. All patients were symptomatic at the time of presentation. Thirty-four airways were found by endoscopy to be obstructed. The mucosal descriptions of these lesions were described only by fiberoptic bronchoscopy. There were no significant differences between both bronchoscopes regarding the type of the lesion [endoluminal or extrinsic compression], the degree of obstruction [partial, near total or total], the origin of the masses and its extent. Exploration distal to the obstructing mass was possible in 61.8% of the airways by virtual bronchoscopy and only in 32.4% by fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Virtual bronchoscopy reported sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 87% in detecting extrinsic compression while in endoluminal masses, it reported sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 79%. However, regarding the degree of obstruction, virtual bronchoscopy reported in partial obstruction sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 75.9%. The sensitivity of virtual bronchoscopy in near-total obstruction was 80.5% and specificity was 78.9%, and for total obstruction, the sensitivity was 82.3% and the specificity was 80.2%. Virtual bronchoscopy using multislice CT is an accurate mean of estimating airway lesions. It is an easy complementary tool to fibroptic bronchoscopy
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Índice: IMEMR Assunto principal: Patologia / Raios X / Biópsia / Broncoscopia / Estudo Comparativo / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Sensibilidade e Especificidade Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Bull. Alex. Fac. Med. Ano de publicação: 2008
Buscar no Google
Índice: IMEMR Assunto principal: Patologia / Raios X / Biópsia / Broncoscopia / Estudo Comparativo / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Sensibilidade e Especificidade Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Bull. Alex. Fac. Med. Ano de publicação: 2008