Cholecysto cholangiography versus cystic duct cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective controlled randomized trial
Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology. 2011; 41 (1): 119-130
em Inglês
| IMEMR
| ID: emr-110697
ABSTRACT
This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of cholecysto-cholangiography [CCC], an extremely rapid and easy way of imaging the biliary tree during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and a viable alternative to cystic duct cholangiography in the era of minimal invasive surgery. Sixty patients with symptomatic gallbladder stones were studied in this series, 30 were evaluated for cholecysto-cholangiography and other 30 for transcystic-cholangiography. The success rate in cholecysto-cholangiography approached 80% with excellent quality films obtained. Delineation of anatomy approached 85%; 75% for cholecysto-cholangiography and transcystic cholangiography respectively. Exposure time to radiation compares favourably with cystic duct cannulation with a mean time 2.4 min. Cholecysto-cholangiography added less than 11 mins to the procedure; mean 10.4 mins, while transcystic cholangiography added an extra 30 mins; mean 31 mins. There were no cholangiogram related complications or false positive findings with a smooth for two months follow up
Buscar no Google
Índice:
IMEMR (Mediterrâneo Oriental)
Assunto principal:
Estudo Comparativo
/
Colangiografia
/
Estudos Prospectivos
/
Ensaio Clínico Controlado Aleatório
/
Ducto Cístico
Tipo de estudo:
Ensaio Clínico Controlado
Limite:
Feminino
/
Humanos
/
Masculino
Idioma:
Inglês
Revista:
J. Egypt. Soc. Parasitol.
Ano de publicação:
2011
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS