Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Tragal cartilage tympanoplasty for management of atelectatic tympanic membrane: palisade versus cross hatched cartilage
Tanta Medical Journal. 2007; 35 (October): 1025-1032
em Inglês | IMEMR | ID: emr-118435
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcomes of two cartilage tympanoplasty techniques for management of posterosuperior pars tensa atelectasis to achieve an acceptable compromise between sufficient mechanical stability and acceptable acoustic transfer characteristics of the cartilage graft. A prospective clinical study included patients who underwent cartilage tympanoplasty between April 2003 and March 2006. The study included 42 [patients with grade 3 posterosuperior pars tensa atelectasis, twenty males and twenty two females, their ages ranged between 22 and 48 years [mean age 32 +/ 3.6]. Eight patients had bilateral ear diseases operated separately with 6 months interval 50 cartilage tympanoplasties were performed. Of these procedures, 24 ears were grafted with tragal cartilage palisades [group A] and 26 ears [group B] were grafted with tragal cross hatched cartilage [modified cartilage plate]. Hearing results were reported using a four-frequency [0.5, 1, 2, 4 kHz] pure-tone average air-bone - gap [PTA-ABG]. Patients were follow up for 12 months through regular visits [weekly for the first month then monthly till the end of follow-up period]. Data were analyzed using Wilcoxon analysis for unpaired data and Chi-square [X[2]] test for comparisons of non-parametric results. The criteria for success were complete healing, prevention of further retraction in posterosuperior quadrant, and air-bone gap less than 20 dB. In palisade group [group A], 2 patients developed posterosuperior retraction [8%] and 2 patients developed anterior retraction. Compared with the outcomes of cross hatched cartilage tympanoplasty group [group B] in which 2 patients developed posterosuperior retraction and three patients develop anterior retraction, there was no significant difference. In group A, the hearing threshold improved in all patients except the two with recurrent retraction. The air- bone gap significantly decreased at all frequencies with significant decrease of mean PTA-ABG from 19.9 +/- 3.4 dB preoperative to 16.7 +/- 3 dB postoperative. Also, the cross hatched cartilage tympanoplasty had a significant decreasing effect on air-bone gap from 29.9 +/- 3.3 dB preoperativeiy to 13.4 +/- 2.6 dB postoperative. Comparing the postoperative hearing threshold of group [A] and group [B] revealed significant better acoustic outcome of cross hatched tympanoplasty technique. The cross hatched tragal cartilage tympanoplasty is a promising method for management of grade 3 postersuperior pars tensa retraction with good stability and acoustic

outcomes:

Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Índice: IMEMR (Mediterrâneo Oriental) Assunto principal: Estudo Comparativo / Cartilagem / Seguimentos Limite: Feminino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Inglês Revista: Tanta Med. J. Ano de publicação: 2007

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Buscar no Google
Índice: IMEMR (Mediterrâneo Oriental) Assunto principal: Estudo Comparativo / Cartilagem / Seguimentos Limite: Feminino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Inglês Revista: Tanta Med. J. Ano de publicação: 2007