Efficacy of gluma desensitizer[TM] and duraphat[TM] in relieving dentinal hypersensitivity in non-carious cervical lesions
Pakistan Oral and Dental Journal. 2011; 31 (1): 183-186
em Inglês
| IMEMR
| ID: emr-124723
ABSTRACT
The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of Gluma Desensitizer[TM] and Duraphat[TM] in relieving dentinal hypersensitivity in non-carious cervical lesions by a randomized control trial. 196 patients having hypersensitive non-carious cervical lesions were divided into two groups. Gluma Desensitizer[TM] was applied to patients in Group A and Duraphat[TM] to patients ingroup B. Patient's pain response to compressed air was recorded on the visual analogue scale at baseline, 5 minutes, 7 days and 30 days after treatment. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 12. Comparison of sensitivity between the two treatment groups on application of compressed air showed a statistically significant difference. The results of this study showed that Gluma Desensitizer[TM] showed better results in relieving dentinal hypersensitivity than Duraphat[TM] in non-carious cervical lesions
Buscar no Google
Índice:
IMEMR (Mediterrâneo Oriental)
Assunto principal:
Fluoreto de Sódio
/
Medição da Dor
/
Fluoretos Tópicos
/
Glutaral
/
Cárie Radicular
/
Ar Comprimido
/
Metacrilatos
Tipo de estudo:
Ensaio Clínico Controlado
Limite:
Feminino
/
Humanos
/
Masculino
Idioma:
Inglês
Revista:
Pak. Oral Dent. J.
Ano de publicação:
2011
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS