Initial experience of fractional flow reserve in 30 patients with moderate coronary artery lesions at armed forces institute of cardiology

ABSTRACT

To evaluate our initial experience of Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] for decision making in coronary revascularization in moderate lesions. A descriptive study. Armed Forces Institute of Cardiology/National Institute of Heart Diseases from August 2009 to August 2010. A total of 30 consecutive patients who underwent FFR at AFIC/NIHD from August 2009 to August 2010. These were the cases in which decision regarding PCI was difficult on visual assessment alone as experienced operators differed in their opinion. A 0.014" FFR wire was used and pressure gradients across the lesions were noted A total of 30 patients with 44 moderate lesions on coronary angiography were evaluated in our initial experience. Amongst these, 27 [61.4%] LAD lesions were studied [20 lesions had an FFR > 0.80 while 7 [15.9%] had an FFR 0.80 or less]. Seven [15.9%] lesions of LCX were evaluated [5 had an FFR > 0.80 and 2 had 0.80 or less]. Seven [15.9%] lesions were of RCA [4 had an FFR >0.80, 3 had 0.80 or less]. One case of LMS lesion was found to be non-critical. Two [4.5%] vein graft lesions were included of which one was found to be angiographically critical, [FFR 0.72]. Out of the total 44 lesions studied 14 [31.82%] lesions were critical with an FFR 0.80 or less, which were stented. Thus 30 stents were saved. This reduced the cost, as well as the un-necessary hazards and risks associated with PCI and the issue of difference in opinion was put to rest. We thus conclude that FFR is a very important tool in guiding the interventionist for planning PCI in moderate lesions