Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Termination of ventilatory support of a patient under compulsion, who is not yet brain dead
Anaesthesia, Pain and Intensive Care. 2013; 17 (1): 10-13
em Inglês | IMEMR | ID: emr-142488
ABSTRACT
Clinicians are more comfortable psychologically in withholding a treatment than withdrawing it. Reasons for this are related to the fact that withholding is passive, whereas withdrawing is active and associated with a greater sense of moral responsibility. Withdrawing or terminating ventilation in Intensive Care Unit [ICU], even in a terminally sick patient, needs thoughtful review, particularly in those patients who are not yet brain dead. So many arguments may be offered against termination of ventilatory support. Ventilation is a part of palliative care which is always instituted to improve the quality of life and to relieve physical as well as psychosocial problems. Age is a very important factor as younger patients have a greater chance to improve than elderly, if the brain is not yet dead. Even during end of life care, not only ventilation is continued, but antibiotics, nutrition and care of bed-sores etc is also continued. As far as moral principles are concerned, termination of ventilation or withholding it, are equivalent in terms of medical ethics. Dignity of dying is as vital and important as dignity of living. One can always justify continuation of ventilation on ethical grounds. There is clinical precedence for this practice. In the opinion of the Supreme Court, withdrawing of life support should be considered synonymous as a kind of euthanasia. So, the termination of ventilation under compulsion would stand illegal and unlawful. Discontinuation of ventilation on economic reasons must be considered immoral and irrational. Sometimes the decision of terminating ventilatory support may be taken in the absence of interdisciplinary communication or that with the family of the patient. Many religious beliefs argue against the termination of ventilation. There are some religious groups who even challenge the existing brain death criteria. I would suggest that all these factors should be considered before taking the decision to terminate the ventilatory support under compulsion in a terminally sick patient, whose is not yet brain dead
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Índice: IMEMR (Mediterrâneo Oriental) Assunto principal: Cuidados Paliativos / Papel do Médico / Religião / Respiração Artificial / Eutanásia Passiva / Cultura / Suspensão de Tratamento / Ética Médica / Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Limite: Humanos Idioma: Inglês Revista: Anaesth. Pain Intensive Care Ano de publicação: 2013

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Buscar no Google
Índice: IMEMR (Mediterrâneo Oriental) Assunto principal: Cuidados Paliativos / Papel do Médico / Religião / Respiração Artificial / Eutanásia Passiva / Cultura / Suspensão de Tratamento / Ética Médica / Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Limite: Humanos Idioma: Inglês Revista: Anaesth. Pain Intensive Care Ano de publicação: 2013