Radiological evaluation of the stability of crossed-pins versus lateral-pins fixation in displaced supracondylar fractures of humerus
JSP-Journal of Surgery Pakistan International. 2013; 18 (3): 126-130
em Inglês
| IMEMR
| ID: emr-149963
ABSTRACT
To compare the radiological evaluation of stability of closed reduction of supracondylar fractures of humerus treated by percutaneous two-crossed-pin fixation and 2-lateral pin fixation. Randomized controlled trial. Orthopedic Unit Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar, from January 2008 to July 2009. Fifty patients with displaced supracondylar fracture of humerus presented between ages 1-12 year were randomly allocated in two groups of 25 patients each and were subjected to crossed-pin fixation and 2-lateral pin-fixation. Primary outcome measure was determined with the help of Baumann angle. Secondary outcome measure was determined with the help of Metaphyseal-Diaphyseal [MD] angle. Mean age of patients was 7.02 +/- 2.25 year. Mean loss of Baumann angle and Metaphyseal Diaphyseal angles were 5.360 +/- 2.220 and 2.420 +/- 1.250 respectively. The mean Baumann angle loss in the two cross pins fixation group and the 2-lateral pins fixation group were 5.56° +/- 1.80° and 5.16° +/- 2.64° respectively. The mean MD angle loss in the two crossed pins fixation group and the 2-lateral pins fixation group was 2.440 +/- 1.220 and 2.400 +/- 1.230 respectively. When loss of Baumann and Metaphyseal-Diaphyseal angles were compared between two methods of fixation using Student t test, no significant difference in the stability of two methods of pin fixation was observed. Radiological analysis showed that both the techniques were effective in terms of stability
Buscar no Google
Índice:
IMEMR (Mediterrâneo Oriental)
Assunto principal:
Radiologia
/
Pinos Ortopédicos
/
Fixação de Fratura
/
Fraturas Fechadas
/
Úmero
Tipo de estudo:
Ensaio Clínico Controlado
Limite:
Feminino
/
Humanos
/
Masculino
Idioma:
Inglês
Revista:
J. Surg. Pak. Int.
Ano de publicação:
2013
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS