Results of distraction compression and compression distraction in segmental defects of tibia with the use of Ilizarov's external fixator

ABSTRACT

To compare the results of distraction-compression and compression-distraction in segmental loss of tibia by Ilizarov extent fixator and to see the functional end results of each procedure. Comparative study. This study was carried out in the Department of Orthopaedic, Nishtar Hospital, Multan from April 2008 to March 2010. A total of 30 cases were included in the study. Gap non-union in tibia is a frequently encountered problem in open tibial injuries. Their treatment have been unsatisfactory until the introduction of distraction histeogenesis by Ilizarov, before the end results were often amputation. Gap non-union of up to 5 cm can be managed by initial compression, later on the LLD is addressed and distraction histeognesis whereas gap of >5 cm are amicably managed by segment transport i.e. distraction and later compression between the transported segment to other end of the fracture. Both methods are excellent if the limitations and principles are followed. Our recommendations are gaps of < 5 cm to be managed and compression-distraction of gaps of >5 cm to be managed with distraction compression mode of treatment