Comparison of hospital versus rural eye camp based pediatric cataract surgery
MEAJO-Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology. 2012; 19 (1): 141-146
em En
| IMEMR
| ID: emr-162719
Biblioteca responsável:
EMRO
To compare the outcomes of pediatric cataract surgery with intraocular lens [IOL] implantation in an eye camp setting and tertiary care center. Children aged 5-16 years with visually significant cataract underwent phacoaspiration with IOL implantation in an eye camp [eye camp group] or tertiary care center [TCC group]. All surgeries incorporated contemporary microsurgical techniques with implantation of polymethyl-methacrylate [PMMA] IOL. Major postoperative complications were managed at a tertiary care center. Postoperative complications, visual acuity and compliance were evaluated using the Chi-square test. A P value less then 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. The cohort comprised 59 children in the eye camp group and 48 children in the TCC group. Thirty two of fifty nine [54.23%] eyes in the eye camp group and 30/48 [62.5%] eyes in the TCC group achieved 20/40 or better best corrected visual acuity [BCVA] postoperatively. Postoperatively, 36 [61%] eyes in the eye camp group and 22 [45.83%] eyes in the TCC group required Nd: YAG laser capsulotomy or a pars plana membranectomy. [P>0.05] The most striking feature was loss to follow up. In the eye camp group, loss to follow was 20% at one year, 49% at two years, 62% at 3 years and 67% at 4 years compared to 12.5, 21, 27 and 33% respectively in the TCC group [P<0.05, all cases]. The outcomes of camp and tertiary care center [hospital] based pediatric cataract surgery were similar. However, the major drawback of camp based surgery was loss to follow up which eventually affected the management of amblyopia and postoperative complications
Buscar no Google
Índice:
IMEMR
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Middle East Afr. J. Ophthalmol.
Ano de publicação:
2012