Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Professionalism; how to match the general medical council recommendations in undergraduate medical curriculum?
Professional Medical Journal-Quarterly [The]. 2015; 22 (5): 664-669
em Inglês | IMEMR | ID: emr-166873
ABSTRACT
This paper describes a practical and valid technique for curriculum audit of professionalism theme of an MBChB programme in a UK medical school. The objective was to match the learning outcomes of professionalism covered in an MBChB course, with the guidelines laid by the GMC in Tomorrows Doctors 2003. The benefit being to determine the issues that needs to be addressed in response to the GMC Tomorrows Doctors 2009. A qualitative study design. 2011. University of Glasgow. To analyse the learning outcomes set out in the curriculum documents. All the statements from the explicit curriculum, and the GMC recommendations in Tomorrow's Doctors [2[nd] and 3[rd] Editions] were noted and the individual statements were entered into the NVivo software. A purposive sampling procedure was undertaken to identify "professionalism" in the Year 1 and 2 MBChB curricula and the Tomorrows Doctors, and a comparative content analysis completed. The coverage of learning outcomes related to professionalism was between 10-20%, scattered throughout the course in different domains of the MBChB, giving a balanced weight to each outcome. The professionalism theme of the MBChB course has covered all the learning outcomes of the Tomorrows Doctors in almost exactly the same frequency as suggested by the GMC according to the course requirements of Year 1 and 2. However, the MBChB course needs to be slightly modified to align it with the new guidelines by the GMC
Buscar no Google
Índice: IMEMR (Mediterrâneo Oriental) Idioma: Inglês Revista: Professional Med. J.-Q Ano de publicação: 2015

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Buscar no Google
Índice: IMEMR (Mediterrâneo Oriental) Idioma: Inglês Revista: Professional Med. J.-Q Ano de publicação: 2015