Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diathermy tonsillectomy vs conventional dissection tonsillectomy
JPMI-Journal of Postgraduate Medical Institute. 2004; 18 (4): 636-643
em Inglês | IMEMR | ID: emr-67117
ABSTRACT
To compare the conventional method of tonsillectomy, the dissection snare method with that of the newer procedure, bipolar electrodissection method. We studied 200 cases in two groups, hundred in each. In the first group the patients underwent tonsillectomy by dissection-snare method and in the second by electrodissection method. The results of the two groups were studied regarding the time taken in the procedure, blood loss during the procedure, postoperative analgesia required, reactionary hemorrhage, postoperative diet toleration and secondary hemorrhage. The average operation time was 14.2 minutes for diathermy group and 35 minutes for the dissection-snare group. Regarding the postoperative diet taken and reactionary heamorrhage the bipolar diathermy method is better, but there is no significant difference regarding the postoperative analgesia, postoperative pain and secondary hemorrhage. We concluded that bipolar electrodissection [diathermy] method is the superior method regarding the time taken during the procedure, the intra operative blood loss was lower and there was no need of ties [ligating the bleeding vessels] in the diathermy

method:

Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Índice: IMEMR (Mediterrâneo Oriental) Assunto principal: Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios / Diatermia / Dissecação Limite: Feminino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Inglês Revista: J. Postgrad. Med. Inst. Ano de publicação: 2004

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Buscar no Google
Índice: IMEMR (Mediterrâneo Oriental) Assunto principal: Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios / Diatermia / Dissecação Limite: Feminino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Inglês Revista: J. Postgrad. Med. Inst. Ano de publicação: 2004