Annals of King Edward Medical College. 2005; 11 (3): 279-281
em Inglês
| IMEMR
| ID: emr-69651
ABSTRACT
In this study total hundred patients wee included. Fifty [group I] were subjected to COPA device for airway maintenance and in other fifty [group II] LMA was used. In this study first attempt successful insertion rate in group I was 90% while in group II it was 94%. However statistical analysis showed no significant different in both groups. Regarding maneuvers needed to maintain smooth breathing in group I head tilt was used in 2%. It is significantly high in group I than in group II. Laboured breathing was seen in 6% in group I while 2% in group II. There was no significant difference in both groups. According to this study LMA is better in all respect as it is easier to insert and better fit in
Buscar no Google
Índice:
IMEMR (Mediterrâneo Oriental)
Assunto principal:
Respiração
/
Máscaras Laríngeas
/
Anestesia
Limite:
Feminino
/
Humanos
/
Masculino
Idioma:
Inglês
Revista:
Ann. King Edward Med. Coll.
Ano de publicação:
2005
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS