Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Lichtenstein versus laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: a propective randomized controlled study
Kasr El Aini Journal of Surgery. 2005; 5 (1): 80-86
em Inglês | IMEMR | ID: emr-72931
ABSTRACT
Hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed general surgical procedures. Several methods have been developed over years to improve the traditional methods of hernia repair. The most important recent innovations being the Lichtenstein mesh repair and the laparoscopic mesh repair. To compare Lichtenstein hernia repair with Laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal hernia repair [TEP]. A prospective randomized controlled study including a total of 96 male patients with 110 inguinal hernias. They were randomized into 2 groups, group I underwent laparoscopic [TEP repair [n = 56] 50.9% and group 2 underwent Lichtenstein repair [n = 54] 49.1% for inguinal hernia. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 10.0 where student 1-tests and chi-square tests, were applied. The two groups of patients were comparable in age and type of hernia. The mean age in the first group was 44.4 +/- 14.6 years [range from 19-65 years], in the second group was 46.8 +/- 14.7 years [range from 20-70 years] and P value was > 0.05. In unilateral hernias the operative time was comparable in both groups. [49 +/- 5.5 min. in group 1 and 50.2 +/- 9.3 min. in group 2] and P > 0.05. On the other hand, in bilateral and recurrent cases the operative lime was 65 +/- 9.1 min. and 48.3 +/- 2.9 min in-group 1 [TEP], while in-group 2 [open], it was 81.7 +/- 7.6 min. and 66.3 +/- 7.5 min. respectively. This was significantly positive [P < 0.05]. Hospital stay was shorter in laparoscopic group [1.6 +/- 0.6 nights] than in open group [2.1 +/- 0.8 nights], but this was not statistically significant [P > 0.05]. On average, analgesia was taken for 5 +/- 1.1 days after Lichtenstein repair compared with 3.1 +/- 1 days after laparoscopic repair [p < 0.05]. Post-operatively, a seroma or a wound haemnatomna developed in five [9.3%] patients after Lichtenstein repair and in one [1.8%] patient after laparoscopic repair [p < 0.05]. Other complications like urinary retention and surgical emphysema were minimal and comparable in both groups. There was no recurrence in either group of patients all over the period of follow up ranged from 3-24 months [mean 15 +/- 7.3 months]. This study confirms that, in short term evaluation, laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair is superior to Lichtenstein repair in term of hospital stay, post operative pain, complications and operative time particularly in bilateral and recurrent cases
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Índice: IMEMR (Mediterrâneo Oriental) Assunto principal: Dor Pós-Operatória / Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Recidiva / Telas Cirúrgicas / Resultado do Tratamento / Laparoscopia / Tempo de Internação / Liechtenstein Tipo de estudo: Ensaio Clínico Controlado Limite: Humanos / Masculino País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: Inglês Revista: Kasr El Aini J. Surg. Ano de publicação: 2005

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Buscar no Google
Índice: IMEMR (Mediterrâneo Oriental) Assunto principal: Dor Pós-Operatória / Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Recidiva / Telas Cirúrgicas / Resultado do Tratamento / Laparoscopia / Tempo de Internação / Liechtenstein Tipo de estudo: Ensaio Clínico Controlado Limite: Humanos / Masculino País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: Inglês Revista: Kasr El Aini J. Surg. Ano de publicação: 2005