Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Guided bone regeneration with subperiosteal implants of PTFE and hydroxyapatite physical barriers in rats
Macedo, Nelson Luiz de; Macedo, Luís Guilherme Scavone de; Matuda, Fábio da Silva; Ouchi, Suzana Martins; Monteiro, Adriana Socorro Ferreira; Carvalho, Yasmin Rodarte.
  • Macedo, Nelson Luiz de; UNESP. São José dos Campos School of Dentistry. Department of Surgery, Periodontics and Radiology. São José dos Campos. BR
  • Macedo, Luís Guilherme Scavone de; UNESP. São José dos Campos School of Dentistry. Department of Surgery, Periodontics and Radiology. São José dos Campos. BR
  • Matuda, Fábio da Silva; UNESP. São José dos Campos School of Dentistry. Department of Surgery, Periodontics and Radiology. São José dos Campos. BR
  • Ouchi, Suzana Martins; UNESP. São José dos Campos School of Dentistry. Department of Surgery, Periodontics and Radiology. São José dos Campos. BR
  • Monteiro, Adriana Socorro Ferreira; UNESP. São José dos Campos School of Dentistry. Department of Surgery, Periodontics and Radiology. São José dos Campos. BR
  • Carvalho, Yasmin Rodarte; UNESP. São José dos Campos School of Dentistry. Department of Surgery, Periodontics and Radiology. São José dos Campos. BR
Braz. dent. j ; 14(2): 119-124, 2003. ilus
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-347123
ABSTRACT
Regeneration of periodontal and alveolar ridge defects utilizing membranes is a well-established procedure in reconstructive surgery. Biomaterial characteristics and membrane design employed in guided tissue regeneration (GTR) techniques play an important role in good results. The purpose of this histologic experimental study in rats was to compare the use of two physical barriers in the osteopromotion by using GTR principles in bone defects created in tibias. Fifteen animals divided into 3groups were used group I (non-porous polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) barrier), group II (coral hydroxyapatite (HA) blocks), and group III (defects that received no physical barrier). Histological examination showed varied amounts of newly formed bone beneath both types of barriers. The non-porous PTFE barrier showed better results than the HA group. The results of this study suggest that bone regeneration can be successfully enhanced by a submerged membrane technique
Assuntos
Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: LILACS (Américas) Assunto principal: Regeneração Óssea / Implantes Experimentais / Regeneração Tecidual Guiada / Membranas Artificiais Limite: Animais Idioma: Inglês Revista: Braz. dent. j Assunto da revista: Odontologia Ano de publicação: 2003 Tipo de documento: Artigo País de afiliação: Brasil Instituição/País de afiliação: UNESP/BR

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: LILACS (Américas) Assunto principal: Regeneração Óssea / Implantes Experimentais / Regeneração Tecidual Guiada / Membranas Artificiais Limite: Animais Idioma: Inglês Revista: Braz. dent. j Assunto da revista: Odontologia Ano de publicação: 2003 Tipo de documento: Artigo País de afiliação: Brasil Instituição/País de afiliação: UNESP/BR