Comparison of different analytic algorithms for interpretation of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm strategy
Clinics
;
63(3): 333-338, 2008. tab
Artigo
em Inglês
| LILACS
| ID: lil-484758
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
To compare 4 analytic algorithms for interpretation of the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm.INTRODUCTION:
Analytic algorithms were initially developed for interpretation of standard automated perimetry (using a full threshold strategy). The Swedish interactive threshold algorithm is a novel strategy that was developed to shorten test duration.METHODS:
One hundred forty-three printouts of normal and glaucomatous patients were analyzed using Caprioli's (strict, moderate and liberal) criteria and Anderson's modified criteria for perimetric defect. Areas under the receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves, sensitivity, and specificity for each criteria were calculated.RESULTS:
Caprioli's strict and Anderson's modified criteria presented similar sensitivity (94.5 percent and 92.3 percent, respectively) and specificity (63.5 percent and 61.5 percent, respectively). Caprioli's liberal criteria were more sensitive (98.9 percent) and less specific (42.5 percent) than the other three criteria.CONCLUSION:
Both Caprioli's and Anderson's modified criteria can be used for interpretation of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm.
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
LILACS (Américas)
Assunto principal:
Algoritmos
/
Glaucoma
/
Testes de Campo Visual
Tipo de estudo:
Estudo diagnóstico
/
Estudo prognóstico
/
Estudo de rastreamento
Limite:
Feminino
/
Humanos
/
Masculino
Idioma:
Inglês
Revista:
Clinics
Assunto da revista:
Medicina
Ano de publicação:
2008
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
País de afiliação:
Brasil
Instituição/País de afiliação:
School of Medical Sciences/BR
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS