Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Hyaluronan does not improve bone healing in critical size calvarial defects in rats: a radiographic evaluation
Brazão, Mariana Amade Mendes; Bezerra, Beatriz de Brito; Casati, Márcio Zaffalon; Sallum, Enilson Antônio; Sallum, Antônio Wilson.
  • Brazão, Mariana Amade Mendes; São Leopoldo Mandic Dental School. Department of Endodontics. BR
  • Bezerra, Beatriz de Brito; State University of Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics. Piracicaba. BR
  • Casati, Márcio Zaffalon; State University of Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics. Piracicaba. BR
  • Sallum, Enilson Antônio; State University of Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics. Piracicaba. BR
  • Sallum, Antônio Wilson; State University of Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics. Piracicaba. BR
Braz. j. oral sci ; 9(2): 124-127, Apr.-June 2010. ilus, tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-578076
ABSTRACT

Aim:

This study evaluated radiographically the effects of 1% hyaluronan in bone healing using a critical size rat-calvaria defect model.

Methods:

Thirty adult male Wistar rats were used in this study. Two 6-mm-diameter critical-size defects were created and the treatments were randomly distributed as follows 1) 1% hyaluronan; 2) 1% hyaluronan soak loaded onto an absorbable collagen sponge (ACS) carrier; 3) saline; and 4) ACS alone. The animals were sacrificed at 4 and 8 weeks when biopsies were collected and radiographs obtained using a direct digital radiograph system and a standardized protocol. A blind examiner evaluated the radiographic density of the images twice and an intra class correlation was performed to evaluate examiner reproducibility (R2=0.99, p<0.001). Comparisons between 4 and 8 weeks of treatment were performed by Student’s t test and comparisons between treatments and time by two-way A NOVA at 5% significance level.

Results:

There were no noteworthy differences between 4 or 8 weeks within each treatment group (p>0.05). When treatments were compared no significant differences between groups were found (p>0.05).

Conclusions:

Within the limits of this study, it can be concluded that 1% hyaluronan gel alone or its association with a carrier does not improve bone healing.
Assuntos

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: LILACS (Américas) Assunto principal: Crânio / Materiais Biocompatíveis / Regeneração Óssea / Densidade Óssea / Ácido Hialurônico Tipo de estudo: Guia de Prática Clínica Limite: Animais Idioma: Inglês Revista: Braz. j. oral sci Assunto da revista: Odontologia Ano de publicação: 2010 Tipo de documento: Artigo País de afiliação: Brasil Instituição/País de afiliação: State University of Campinas/BR / São Leopoldo Mandic Dental School/BR

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: LILACS (Américas) Assunto principal: Crânio / Materiais Biocompatíveis / Regeneração Óssea / Densidade Óssea / Ácido Hialurônico Tipo de estudo: Guia de Prática Clínica Limite: Animais Idioma: Inglês Revista: Braz. j. oral sci Assunto da revista: Odontologia Ano de publicação: 2010 Tipo de documento: Artigo País de afiliação: Brasil Instituição/País de afiliação: State University of Campinas/BR / São Leopoldo Mandic Dental School/BR