Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Peri-orbital bone dimensional analysis using computed tomography for placement of osseointegrated implants
Fernandes, Clemente Maia S; Mattos, Beatriz Silva Câmara; Cavalcanti, Marcelo de Gusmão Paraíso; Fonseca, Luciana Cardoso; Serra, Mônica da Costa.
  • Fernandes, Clemente Maia S; São Paulo State University - UNESP. Faculty of Dentistry of Araraquara. Department of Social Dentistry. Araraquara. BR
  • Mattos, Beatriz Silva Câmara; University of São Paulo. School of Dentistry. Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Traumatology. São Paulo. BR
  • Cavalcanti, Marcelo de Gusmão Paraíso; University of São Paulo. School of Dentistry. Department of Stomatology. São Paulo. BR
  • Fonseca, Luciana Cardoso; Catholic University of Minas Gerais. School of Dentistry. Department of Oral Diagnosis. Belo Horizonte. BR
  • Serra, Mônica da Costa; São Paulo State University - UNESP. Faculty of Dentistry of Araraquara. Department of Social Dentistry. Araraquara. BR
Braz. j. oral sci ; 11(1): 1-9, jan.-mar. 2012. ilus
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-638394
ABSTRACT
Craniofacial osseointegrated implants enabled producing implant-retained facial prosthesis, namelythe orbital prosthesis.

Aim:

To evaluate the length and width of the bone structure of the peri-orbitalregion and to present the method validation.

Methods:

Computed tomography scans of 30 dryhuman skulls were obtained in order to register linear length and width measurements of the periorbitalregion. Two examiners made the measurements twice with intervals of at least 7 daysbetween them. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and the paired Student’s t-test wasused as inferential technique (SAS, α=0.05).

Results:

In most cases, the intra- and inter-examinervariations were not significant (p>0.05). Therefore, the method proposed was considered asprecise and valid for the measurement of the peri-orbital region. The measured points correspondto the hours of a clock. The major lengths were observed at 1 h (18.32 mm) for the left peri-orbitalbone and at 11h (19.28 mm) for the right peri-orbital bone, followed by the points situated at 2h(13.05 mm) and 12h (11.37 mm) for the left side and at 10 h (12.34 mm) and 12 h (11.56 mm) forthe right side. It was verified that the three points with lowest values followed the same anatomicalsequence in the supraorbital rim for the right and left orbits, showing compatibility with the insertionof the intraoral osseointegrated implants. The medial wall of both orbits did not present sufficientlength to allow the insertion of intraoral or craniofacial implants.

Conclusions:

The largest widthpoints were observed in the supraorbital rim and in the infralateral region of both orbits and thoseof smallest width were found in the supralateral region of both orbits.
Assuntos
Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: LILACS (Américas) Assunto principal: Órbita / Implantes Dentários Idioma: Inglês Revista: Braz. j. oral sci Assunto da revista: Odontologia Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Artigo País de afiliação: Brasil Instituição/País de afiliação: Catholic University of Minas Gerais/BR / São Paulo State University - UNESP/BR / University of São Paulo/BR

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: LILACS (Américas) Assunto principal: Órbita / Implantes Dentários Idioma: Inglês Revista: Braz. j. oral sci Assunto da revista: Odontologia Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Artigo País de afiliação: Brasil Instituição/País de afiliação: Catholic University of Minas Gerais/BR / São Paulo State University - UNESP/BR / University of São Paulo/BR