Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of clinical characteristics between healthcare-associated pneumonia and community-acquired pneumonia in patients admitted to secondary hospitals
Lee, Jong Hoo; Kim, Yee Hyung.
  • Lee, Jong Hoo; Jeju National University. School of Medicine. Jeju National University Hospital. Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine. Jeju. KR
  • Kim, Yee Hyung; Kyung Hee University. School of Medicine. Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong. Seoul. KR
Braz. j. infect. dis ; 16(4): 321-328, July-Aug. 2012. ilus, tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-645419
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Since healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) is heterogeneous, clinical characteristics and outcomes are different from region to region. There can also be differences between HCAP patients hospitalized in secondary or tertiary hospitals. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics of HCAP patients admitted into secondary community hospitals. METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted in patients with HCAP or community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) hospitalized in two secondary hospitals between March 2009 and January 2011. RESULTS: Of a total of 303 patients, 96 (31.7%) had HCAP. 42 patients (43.7%) resided in a nursing home or long-term care facility, 36 (37.5%) were hospitalized in an acute care hospital for > 2 days within 90 days, ten received outpatient intravenous therapy, and eight attended a hospital clinic or dialysis center. HCAP patients were older. The rates of patients with CURB65 scores of 3 or more (22.9% vs. 9.1%; p = 0.001) and PSI class IV or more (82.2% vs. 34.7%; p < 0.001) were higher in the HCAP group. Drug-resistant pathogens were more frequently detected in the HCAP group (23.9% vs. 0.4%; p < 0.001). However, Streptococcus pneumoniae was the most common pathogen in both groups. The rates of antibiotic change, use of inappropriate antibiotics, and failure of initial antibiotic therapy in the HCAP group were significantly higher. Although the overall survival rate of the HCAP group was significantly lower (82.3% vs. 96.8%; p < 0.001), multivariate analyses failed to show that HCAP itself was a prognostic factor for mortality (p = 0.826). Only PSI class IV or more was associated with increased mortality (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: HCAP should be distinguished from CAP because of the different clinical features. However, the current definition of HCAP does not appear to be a prognostic for death. In addition, the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics for HCAP should be reassessed because S. pneumoniae was most frequently identified even in HCAP patients.
Assuntos


Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: LILACS (Américas) Assunto principal: Infecção Hospitalar / Pneumonia Bacteriana Tipo de estudo: Estudo de etiologia / Estudo observacional / Estudo prognóstico / Fatores de risco Limite: Idoso / Aged80 / Feminino / Humanos / Masculino País/Região como assunto: Ásia Idioma: Inglês Revista: Braz. j. infect. dis Assunto da revista: Doenças Transmissíveis Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Artigo País de afiliação: Coréia do Sul Instituição/País de afiliação: Jeju National University/KR / Kyung Hee University/KR

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: LILACS (Américas) Assunto principal: Infecção Hospitalar / Pneumonia Bacteriana Tipo de estudo: Estudo de etiologia / Estudo observacional / Estudo prognóstico / Fatores de risco Limite: Idoso / Aged80 / Feminino / Humanos / Masculino País/Região como assunto: Ásia Idioma: Inglês Revista: Braz. j. infect. dis Assunto da revista: Doenças Transmissíveis Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Artigo País de afiliação: Coréia do Sul Instituição/País de afiliação: Jeju National University/KR / Kyung Hee University/KR