Comparative study of intrathecal pethidine versus lignocaine as an anaesthetic and a postoperative analgesic for perianal surgery.
J Postgrad Med
;
1996 Apr-Jun; 42(2): 43-5
Artigo
em Inglês
| IMSEAR
| ID: sea-116295
ABSTRACT
100 patients with ASA risk I & II and undergoing perianal surgery were studied for anaesthetic effects and postoperative analgesia following either intrathecal pethidine or lignocaine. Saddle block was performed either with intrathecal pethidine 5% (50 mg/ml) 0.5 mg/kg or 1 ml of 5% lignocaine. Sensory and motor block postoperative analgesia, need for additional analgesia were studied. The onset of sensory and motor blockade with lignocaine was faster than pethidine. However the sensory and motor blockade lasted longer with pethidine. The duration of postoperative analgesia was 15.39 +/- 5.14 hours as against duration of postoperative analgesia with lignocaine which was 1.3 +/- 0.53 hours. Only 10% of patients in the pethidine group required intramuscular analgesic supplementation whereas 30% of patients in the lignocaine group required intramuscular analgesic supplementation.
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
IMSEAR (Sudeste Asiático)
Assunto principal:
Doenças do Ânus
/
Dor Pós-Operatória
/
Fatores de Tempo
/
Medição da Dor
/
Feminino
/
Humanos
/
Masculino
/
Analgésicos Opioides
/
Adjuvantes Anestésicos
/
Raquianestesia
Tipo de estudo:
Ensaio Clínico Controlado
Idioma:
Inglês
Revista:
J Postgrad Med
Ano de publicação:
1996
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS