Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with the Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer and ultrasound pachymetry.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 2010 Sept; 58(5): 385-388
Artigo em Inglês | IMSEAR | ID: sea-136093
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

To compare corneal pachymetry assessment by the Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer with that done by ultrasound (US) pachymetry. Materials and

Methods:

Forty six patients (92 eyes) were subjected to corneal pachymetry assessment by Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer and US. All the readings were taken by a single operator. Intraoperator repeatability for the Galilei was assessed by taking 10 readings in one eye each of 10 patients. To study the interoperator reproducibility for the Galilei, two observers took a single reading in both the eyes of 25 patients.

Results:

The mean central corneal thickness (CCT) measured by US was 541.83 ± 30.56 μm standard deviation (SD) and that measured by Galilei was 541.27 ± 30.07 μm (SD). There was no statistically significant difference between both the methods (P < 0.001). The coefficient of repeatability was 0.43% while the coefficient of reproducibility was 0.377% for the Galilei.

Conclusion:

Objective, noncontact measurement of the CCT with the Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer was convenient, had excellent intraoperator repeatability and interoperator reproducibility, and findings were similar to those obtained with standard US pachymetry.
Assuntos

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: IMSEAR (Sudeste Asiático) Assunto principal: Humanos / Variações Dependentes do Observador / Reprodutibilidade dos Testes / Córnea / Técnicas de Diagnóstico Oftalmológico Idioma: Inglês Revista: Indian J Ophthalmol Ano de publicação: 2010 Tipo de documento: Artigo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: IMSEAR (Sudeste Asiático) Assunto principal: Humanos / Variações Dependentes do Observador / Reprodutibilidade dos Testes / Córnea / Técnicas de Diagnóstico Oftalmológico Idioma: Inglês Revista: Indian J Ophthalmol Ano de publicação: 2010 Tipo de documento: Artigo