Myocardial FFR (Fractional Flow Reserve) in patients with angiographically intermediate coronary artery stenosis - an initial institutional experience.

RESEARCH ARTICLE January-March 2013 | Volume 1 | Issue 1 | Page: 4-11 Myocardial FFR (Fractional Flow Reserve) in patients with angiographically intermediate coronary artery stenosis - an initial institutional experience Jagadish H. Ramaiah*, Raghu T. Ramegowda, Srinivas B. Chikkaswamy, Manjunath C. Nanjappa Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences & Research, Jaya Nagar 9th Block, BG Road, Bangalore - 560069, Karnataka, INDIA Correspondence to: Dr. Jagadish H. Ramaiah, Email: jagadishhr@rediffmail.com Background: The clinical significance of coronary artery stenosis of intermediate severity can be difficult to determine. The management of intermediate coronary lesions, defined by a diameter stenosis of ≥40% to ≤70%, continues to be a therapeutic dilemma for cardiologists. The 2-dimensional representation of the arterial lesion provided by angiography is limited in distinguishing intermediate lesions that require stenting from those that simply need appropriate medical therapy. In the era of drug-eluting stents, some might propose that stenting all intermediate coronary lesions is an appropriate solution. However, the possibility of procedural complications such as coronary dissection, no reflow phenomenon, in-stent restenosis, and stent thrombosis requires accurate stratification of patients with intermediate coronary lesions to appropriate therapy. Myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an index of the functional severity of coronary stenosis that is calculated from pressure measurements made during coronary angiography. The objective of the study is to evaluate the usefulness of FFR in patients with angiographically intermediate coronary artery stenosis. Methods: 20 patients with intermediate coronary stenosis and chest pain of uncertain origin. The Exercise Electrocardiography (TMT), Myocardial Perfusion Imaging study (MPI), Quantitative Coronary Angiography (QCA) were compared with the results of FFR measurements. Results: 20 patients were undergone FFR measurement during the study period. With the mean age of 57.25±11.2 and male patients were 16 (80%), female patients 4 (20%), in all 13 patients with an FFR of <0.75, reversible myocardial ischemia was demonstrated unequivocally on at least one noninvasive test. In contrast, 5 of 7 patients with an FFR of >0.75 tested negative for reversible myocardial ischemia on TMT and MPI study. No revascularization procedures were performed in 7 (35%) patients, and no adverse cardiovascular events were noted in all these patients during 6 months of follow-up. Conclusions: In patients with coronary stenosis of intermediate severity, FFR appears to be a useful index of the functional severity of the stenosis and the need for coronary revascularization