Comparative Evaluation of CEPH Ninja for Android and Nemoceph for Computer for Steiner’s Cephalometric Analysis

ABSTRACT

Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, requires a cautious acquisition and interpretation of a large amount of information to achieve a correct diagnosis and treatment planning. Manual techniques are time consuming and tedious. The digital technology is advantageous but the affordability remains obstacle. Objectives: The main aim of this study was to compare the linear and angular measures between the two methods, Ceph Ninja and Nemoceph. No significant difference between the two methods will result in that Ceph Ninja can be used as an alternative. Methods: This study was conducted on 100 digital lateral cephalogram taken from the same machine. The samples were collected by non-probability convenience sampling procedures. These images were analyzed for Steiner’s Cephalometric Analysis using the two software. Results: The results of this study showed the skeletal and dental values had no statistical significant difference in the majority, except for the linear values of Lower Incisor and Upper Incisor with N-A and N-B respectively. Conclusion: It seems that the two software can be used interchangeably with high confidence.