Outcome of patients with stage II and III nonseminomatous germ cell tumors: results of a single center.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The prognostic factors in nonseminomatous germ cell tumors have been mainly derived from the analysis of stage I tumors. AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate some prognostic factors and the outcome of patients with stage II and III nonseminomatous germ cell tumors according to risk groups treated between 1993 and 2002. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Patients were retrospectively classified as good, intermediate and poor risk groups according to International Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Biopsy specimens of 58 patients with stage II and III nonseminomatous germ cell tumors were analyzed by means of tumor histopathology, primary localization site of the tumor, relapse sites, initial serum tumor marker levels, the presence of persistent serum tumor marker elevation and the patients' outcome. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Kruskall Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to determine the differences between the groups. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis and log rank test was used to compare the survival probabilities of groups. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to determine the prognostic factors in univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Five-year overall and disease-free survival rates were calculated as 85% and 75% in stage II; 44% and 29% in stage III cases, respectively. Fifty-seven percent of patients were classified in good risk, 9% in intermediate risk and 27% in poor risk groups. Five-year overall survival rates were 97%, 75% and 7% (P<0.001) and disease-free survival rates were 83%, 34% and 7% (P<0.001) in good, intermediate and poor risk groups, respectively. Analysis of the prognostic factors revealed that the localization site of the primary tumor (P<0.001), the initial beta-HCG level (p0.0048), the presence of yolk sac and choriocarcinoma components in tumor (p0.003 and p0.004), relapse sites of tumor (lung versus other than lung) (p0.003), persistent elevation of serum tumor markers (P<0.001) were significant prognostic factors in univariate analysis. However, in multivariate analysis, only the localization site of tumor (p0.049) and the relapse site (p0.003) were found statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study revealed that in advanced stage of nonseminomatous germ cell tumors, the outcome is essentially related with the localization site of the tumor and the relapse site.