Comparison of GMSV position and prone position in percutaneous nephroscopic surgery:a Meta-analysis / 现代泌尿外科杂志

ABSTRACT

【Objective】 To evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia (GMSV) position and prone position in the treatment of renal calculi. 【Methods】 PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched systematically to identify all eligible studies. Literature collected were screened and data were extracted by three authors independently. RevMan5.4 software was used for Meta-analysis. 【Results】 A total of 9 articles were enrolled, including 7 randomized controlled studies and 2 case-control studies, with a total of 1 690 patients. The results of Meta-analysis showed that compared with the prone position group, the GMSV group had shorter hospital stay (WMD-9.04, 95%CI-16.85--1.22, P=0.02), shorter intraoperative radiation exposure (WMD-1.23, 95%CI-1.98--0.48, P=0.001), lower rate of complications (RR0.72, 95%CI0.59-0.88, P=0.001), but there were no significant differences in operation time, primary stone clearance rate, postoperative hemoglobin loss, blood transfusion rate, fever rate and non-tubulization rate. 【Conclusion】 Compared with percutaneous nephrolithotomy in prone position, percutaneous nephrolithotomy in GMSV position has the comparable stone clearance rate, but has significant advantages in hospital stay, intraoperative radiation time, and overall complications. It is safe for the treatment of renal stones and upper ureteral stones.