Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical study of new and conventional antiepileptic drugs with newly diagnosed partial epilepsy / 中国临床药理学与治疗学
Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics ; (12): 793-799, 2022.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-1014818
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To compare the early response to the new and traditional antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the treatment of partial epilepsy.

METHODS:

Patients from neurology Department of Huzhou Central Hospital between January 2013 and June 2018 were included; outcomes included time to first seizure, time to treatment failure and 6-month, 1- and 2-year seizure-free rates were compared.

RESULTS:

A total of 250 patients with partial epilepsy were divided into carbamazepine (CBZ) group (n =62), levetiracetam (LEV) group (n = 67), oxcarbazepine (OXC) group (n = 63), and lamotrigine (LTG) group (n = 58). In terms of time to first seizure after monotherapy, CBZ and OXC were equivalent (P = 0.635), while CBZ was superi- or to LTG (P LTG > OXC > LEV, and CBZ was superior to OXC and LEV (all P 0.05). A total of 25 patients had adverse reactions; with CBZ (19.3%) more often than LTG (8.6%), OXC (7.9%), or LEV (4.5%).

CONCLUSION:

Treatment response to CBZ is superior compared to that of OXC and LEV, especially in the early stages of treatment, and equivalent to that of LTG, but the incidence of side effects is higher as well.

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Idioma: Chinês Revista: Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Artigo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Idioma: Chinês Revista: Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Artigo