Treatment of Upper and Mid Ureter Stones: Comparison of Semirigid Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy with Holmium: YAG Laser and Shock Wave Lithotripsy / 대한비뇨기과학회지
Korean Journal of Urology
;
: 171-175, 2007.
Artigo
em Coreano
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-116819
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE:
To compare the success rates, complications and cost effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URS) using a Holmium YAG laser to establish the more effective treatment for upper and mid ureter stones. MATERIALS ANDMETHODS:
This retrospective study included 83 and 286 patients treated with URS and ESWL, respectively, for upper and mid ureter stones. URS was performed with a 7.5Fr semi-rigid ureterorenoscope and Holmium YAG laser. ESWL was performed with Stonelith V.5 (PCK, Turkey). The stone sizes, success rates, postoperative complications and cost effectiveness were analyzed for each group.RESULTS:
The overall success rates of the URS and ESWL were 97.6 and 82.5%, respectively. Success rates of URS were 98.4 and 95.2% when the stones were smaller and larger than 10mm, respectively. In the ESWL group, the success rates after the third session were 86.3 and 65.4% with stones smaller and larger than 10mm, respectively. The complication rates associated with URS and ESWL were 6 and 4.2%, respectively. The average cost of URS was lower than that of ESWL. CONCLISIONS In our study, URS with Holmium YAG laser was more efficacious than ESWL. Considering both the success rate and cost effectiveness, URS should remain the recommended first-line treatment for upper and mid ureter stones.
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Assunto principal:
Complicações Pós-Operatórias
/
Choque
/
Ureter
/
Litotripsia
/
Estudos Retrospectivos
/
Análise Custo-Benefício
/
Ureteroscopia
/
Lasers de Estado Sólido
/
Hólmio
Tipo de estudo:
Estudo observacional
Limite:
Humanos
Idioma:
Coreano
Revista:
Korean Journal of Urology
Ano de publicação:
2007
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS