Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative efficacy of biological agents in methotrexate-refractory rheumatoid arthritis patients: a Bayesian mixed treatment comparison
Article em En | WPRIM | ID: wpr-138418
Biblioteca responsável: WPRO
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Biological agents (biologics) targeting proinflammatory signaling have emerged as an important treatment option in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Despite the clinical effectiveness of biologics for patients with RA who do not respond to ‘traditional’ disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), there are concerns regarding their cost and long-term safety. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of various biologics and traditional DMARDs in RA patients refractory to methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: Four DMARDs (hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, MTX, leflunomide) and five anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs (adalimumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, and certolizumab) were selected. A systematic search of published studies was performed from inception through July 2013. Randomized trials of adults with MTX-refractory RA comparing two or more of the selected medications were included. Among 7,938 titles identified, in total, 16 head-to-head trials were selected. Two reviewers independently abstracted the study data and assessed methodological quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias. Comparative efficacy was analyzed using a Bayesian mixed treatment comparison (MTC). RESULTS: In total, 9, 4, and 11 studies were included for the outcome measures of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Disease Activity Score 28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) < 2.6 (remission), and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 70 response, respectively. The treatments with the highest efficacy for each outcome measure were certolizumab combined with MTX, golimumab combined with MTX, and certolizumab combined with MTX, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on MTC analysis, using data from published randomized controlled trials, certolizumab and golimumab combined with MTX showed the highest efficacy in the three outcome measures (HAQ, DAS28-ESR < 2.6, and ACR 70 response) in MTX-refractory RA patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave
Texto completo: 1 Índice: WPRIM Assunto principal: Artrite Reumatoide / Reumatologia / Sulfassalazina / Produtos Biológicos / Fatores Biológicos / Viés / Metotrexato / Resultado do Tratamento / Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde / Antirreumáticos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article
Texto completo: 1 Índice: WPRIM Assunto principal: Artrite Reumatoide / Reumatologia / Sulfassalazina / Produtos Biológicos / Fatores Biológicos / Viés / Metotrexato / Resultado do Tratamento / Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde / Antirreumáticos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article