Cost analysis of sevoflurane anesthesia compared with propofol and remifentanil infusion
Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
; : 231-235, 2011.
Article
em Ko
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-14764
Biblioteca responsável:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cost control in general anesthesia is no longer an option; it is a necessity. New anesthetics have entered the market, but economic differences in comparison to standard anesthetic regimens are not exactly known. The purpose of this study was to compare the cost of a sevoflurane-based strategy with a propofol-based general anesthetic technique. METHODS: Eighty patients undergoing elective surgery were randomly divided into two groups, with 40 patients each. The propofol group received propofol with remifentanil infusion, and the sevoflurane group received sevoflurane with N2O 50%, O2 50% for anesthesia. Sevoflurane consumption was measured by weighing the vaporizer using a precision weighing machine. We recorded the use of all drugs for the induction and maintenance of anesthesia, and postoperative pain control in the postoperative anesthesia care unit. RESULTS: The recovery characteristics were not significantly different in the two groups. Total (intra and postoperative) cost were significantly higher in the propofol group than in the sevoflurane group. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in today's climate of cost savings, a comprehensive pharmacoeconomic approach is needed.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Índice:
WPRIM
Assunto principal:
Dor Pós-Operatória
/
Piperidinas
/
Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores
/
Propofol
/
Clima
/
Redução de Custos
/
Controle de Custos
/
Custos e Análise de Custo
/
Anestesia
/
Anestesia Geral
Tipo de estudo:
Health_economic_evaluation
Limite:
Humans
Idioma:
Ko
Revista:
Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
Ano de publicação:
2011
Tipo de documento:
Article