Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Long-term Clinical Outcomes between Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty in Patients with Bullous Keratopathy
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology ; : 443-450, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-160782
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To compare 2-year clinical outcomes of Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in patients with bullous keratopathy.

METHODS:

A retrospective chart review was performed to obtain 2 years of follow-up data of DSAEK or PK at a single center from March 2009 to September 2012. The study comprised 15 eyes of DSAEK and 11 eyes of PK. Outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical and keratometric changes, central corneal thickness, endothelial cell density, intraocular pressure, and postoperative complications. Graft survival rate was assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

RESULTS:

There were no differences in patient baseline characteristics between the two groups. At postoperative 2 years, better BCVA of 0.69 ± 0.51 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) was found after DSAEK compared to 0.88 ± 0.48 logMAR after PK. Refractive cylinder in DSAEK and PK was −2.60 ± 1.53 and −6.00 ± 1.05 diopters (D), respectively, and keratometric cylinder was 3.27 ± 3.70 and 6.34 ± 3.51 D, respectively, at postoperative 2 years. The difference of mean spherical equivalents between postoperative 1 month and 2 years was 0.84 D after DSAEK and 2.05 D after PK. A hyperopic shift of 1.17 D was present after 2 years of DSAEK. The mean endothelial cell density at postoperative 2 years was 1,548 ± 456 cells/mm² for DSAEK and 1,052 ± 567 cells/mm² for PK, with a cell loss of 19.96% vs. 52.38%, respectively when compared to postoperative 1 month. No significant difference in central corneal thickness was found between DSAEK and PK (592 ± 75 vs. 563 ± 90 µm, respectively). Finally, the 2-year survival rate did not differ significantly between DSAEK and PK (93.3% vs. 81.8%, respectively, p = 0.344).

CONCLUSIONS:

Compared to PK, DSAEK provided more stable refractive errors with better visual outcome, lower endothelial cell loss, and a lower rate of graft rejection at postoperative 2 years in patients with bullous keratopathy.
Assuntos

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Assunto principal: Refração Ocular / Fatores de Tempo / Acuidade Visual / Estudos Retrospectivos / Seguimentos / Ceratoplastia Penetrante / Resultado do Tratamento / Córnea / Doenças da Córnea / Ceratoplastia Endotelial com Remoção da Lâmina Limitante Posterior Tipo de estudo: Estudo observacional / Estudo prognóstico Limite: Feminino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Inglês Revista: Korean Journal of Ophthalmology Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Artigo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Assunto principal: Refração Ocular / Fatores de Tempo / Acuidade Visual / Estudos Retrospectivos / Seguimentos / Ceratoplastia Penetrante / Resultado do Tratamento / Córnea / Doenças da Córnea / Ceratoplastia Endotelial com Remoção da Lâmina Limitante Posterior Tipo de estudo: Estudo observacional / Estudo prognóstico Limite: Feminino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Inglês Revista: Korean Journal of Ophthalmology Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Artigo