The Influence of Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia and Conventional Spinal Anesthesia on Sensitivity to Midazolam Sedation / 대한마취과학회지
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
; : 39-44, 2005.
Article
em Ko
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-187615
Biblioteca responsável:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia potentiates sedative drug effects. We speculated that an acute decrease in tonic afferent input by spinal anesthesia would decrease the level of consciousness and thereby increase susceptibility to sedative drugs. The experiments were approached with the assumption that the amount of sedative would reduce in the following order: first, the group without spinal anesthesia, second, the group with unilateral spinal anesthesia, and third, the group with conventional spinal anesthesia. METHODS: Patients in group 1 (n = 20) were given midazolam without spinal anesthesia and patients in group 2 (n = 20) received unilateral spinal anesthesia. Those patients who after 20 minutes had a sensory level of T9-11 and a motor block of 3 in dependent side, no sensory block, and a motor block of 0 in the non-dependent side were included. In group 3 (n = 20), patients received conventional spinal anesthesia, and those patients who after 20 minutes had a sensory level of T9-11 and a motor block of 3 were included. The amount of midazolam administered at 33microgram/kg/min to a Bispectral Index score (BIS) of 80 was measured. RESULTS: The dose of midazolam administered to a BIS of 80 was significantly lower in group 3 than in group 1 or group 2. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of sedatives was in the following order: the group with conventional spinal anesthesia, the group with unilateral spinal anesthesia, and the group not administered spinal anesthesia.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Índice:
WPRIM
Assunto principal:
Midazolam
/
Estado de Consciência
/
Hipnóticos e Sedativos
/
Raquianestesia
Tipo de estudo:
Diagnostic_studies
Limite:
Humans
Idioma:
Ko
Revista:
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
Ano de publicação:
2005
Tipo de documento:
Article