Radiotherapy in Supraglottic Carcinoma: With Respect to Locoregional Control and Survival / 대한방사선종양학회지

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: A retrospective study was undertaken to determine the role of conventional radiotherapy with or without surgery for treating a supraglottic carcinoma in terms of the local control and survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From Jan. 1986 to Oct. 1996, a total of 134 patients were treated for a supraglottic carcinoma by radiotherapy with or without surgery. Of them, 117 patients who had completed the radiotherapy formed the base of this study. The patients were redistributed according to the revised AJCC staging system (1997). The number of patients of stage I, II, III, IVA, IVB were 6 (5%), 16 (14%), 53 (45 %), 32 (27%), 10 (9%), respectively. Eighty patients were treated by radical radiotherapy in the range of 61.2~79.2 Gy (mean 69.2 Gy) to the primary tumor and 45.0~93.6 Gy (mean 54.0 Gy) to regional lymphatics. All patients with stage I and IVB were treated by radiotherapy alone. Thirty-seven patients underwent surgery plus postoperative radiotherapy in the range of 45.0~68.4 Gy (mean 56.1 Gy) to the primary tumor bed and 45.0~59.4 Gy (mean 47.2 Gy) to the regional lymphatics. Of them, 33 patients received a total laryngectomy (+-lymph node dissection), three had a supraglottic horizontal laryngectomy (+-lymph node dissection), and one had a primary excision alone. RESULTS: The 5-year survival rate (5YSR) of all patients was 43%. The 5YSRs of the patients with stage I+I, III+V were 49.9%, 41.2%, respectively (p=0.27). However, the disease-specific survival rate of the patients with stage I (n=6) was 100%. The 5YSRs of patients who underwent surgery plus radiotherapy (S+T) vs radiotherapy alone (RT) in stage II, III, IVA were 100% vs 43% (p=0.17), 62% vs 52% (p=0.32), 58% vs 6% (P<0.001), respectively. The 5-year actuarial locoregional control rate (5YLCR) of all the patients was 57%. The 5YLCR of the patients with stage I, II, III, IVA, IVB was 100%, 74%, 60%, 44%, 30%, respectively (p=0.008). The 5YLCR of the patients with S+T vs RT in stage II, III, IVA was 100% vs 68% (p=0.29), 67% vs 55% (p=0.23), 81% vs 20% (P<0.001), respectively. In the radiotherapy alone group, the 5YLCR of the patients with a complete, partial, and minimal response were 76%, 20%, 0%, respectively (P<0.001). In all patients, multivariate analysis showed that the N-stage, surgery or not, and age were significant factors affecting the survival rate and that the N-stage, surgery or not, and the ECOG performance index were significant factors affecting the locoregional control. In the radiotherapy alone group, multivariate analysis showed that the radiation response and N-stage were significant factors affecting the overall survival rate as well as locoregional control. CONCLUSION: In early stage supraglottic carcinoma, conventional radiotherapy alone is an equally effective modality compared to surgery plus radiotherapy and could preserve the laryngeal function. However, in the advanced stages, radiotherapy combined with concurrent chemotherapy for laryngeal preservation or surgery should be considered. In bulky neck disease, all the possible planned neck dissections after induction chemotherapy or before radiotherapy should be attempted.